Argumentation-based negotiation for collaborative engineering design
نویسندگان
چکیده
Designing complex systems requires collaboration among multiple engineers who coordinate to plan tasks, cooperate to resolve dependencies, and co-construct to identify shared objectives and solutions. While collaboration technologies have been developed to date, few can help designers negotiate effectively and reach agreement efficiently. In this paper, we propose an argumentation based engineering negotiation approach that provides a structured framework for designers to specify design situations, compose arguments, and make joint decisions by following various strategies. The details of the proposed approach are described and a case study is presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach.
منابع مشابه
A study of argumentation-based negotiation in collaborative design
Engineering of complex systems often involves teamwork. The members of an engineering team must work together to identify design requirements, explore design spaces, generate design alternatives, and make both interactive and joint design decisions. Because of the latency of information and the disciplinary differences, it is often a difficult process for the members of a team to reach agreemen...
متن کاملAn Introduction to The Consensus Model of Engineering Design Decision Making
This paper presents an introduction ~ to a model of a collaborative working environment which supports distributed team argumentation, negotiation, consensus building and rationalecapture. Based on a natural model of team deliberation, this model is the basis for the development of a system which enables team support and the capture of the design rationale in value added activities. The consens...
متن کاملOn Modeling Argumentation as Distributed Constraint Satisfaction: Initial Results
Conflict resolution is a critical problem in distributed and collaborative multi-agent systems. Argumentation-based negotiation, where agents provide explicit arguments or justifications for their proposals for resolving conflicts, is an effective approach to resolve conflicts. However, while small-scale argumentation systems have been developed, a well-understood computational model of argumen...
متن کاملA Comparative Study of Argumentation- and Proposal-Based Negotiation
Recently, argumentation-based negotiation has been proposed as an alternative to classical mechanism design. The main advantage of argumentation-based negotiation is that it allows agents to exchange complex justification positions rather than just simple proposals. Its proponents maintain that this property of argumentation protocols can lead to faster and beneficial agreements when used for c...
متن کاملNegotiation-Collaboration in Formal Technical Reviews
This paper discusses the negotiation-collaboration process: a binomial process mixing collaboration, negotiation and argumentation. We applied the negotiation-collaboration process to Formal Technical Reviews, commonly adopted to verify the functional specification of software. We developed a groupware tool demonstrating the dynamic of the negotiation-collaboration process in Formal Technical R...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009